General News » News

LAV continues roll to Cenotaph park

December 2, 2015   ·   1 Comments

By Brock Weir

A light armoured vehicle (LAV) used by the Canadian Armed Forces in Afghanistan will still take its position at the Aurora Cenotaph next year following an aborted potential u-turn from Council.

The plan to place the LAV at the Cenotaph, otherwise known as the Aurora Peace Park, was presented to Council earlier this fall by the Queen’s York Rangers Regiment. Subsequently approved by Council that evening, the proposal immediately stirred controversy with several members of the public speaking out against the placement of such a vehicle at a venue ostensibly to promote “peace.”

Going into last week’s Council meeting, local lawmakers faced a motion from Councillor John Abel responding to these concerns, calling for a further report on alternative locations for the “purpose-built machine.”

However, an impassioned delegation by Col. Kirk Corkery of the Queen’s York Rangers, accompanied by two uniformed serving members of the Regiment who served Afghanistan, led Councillor Abel to pull the plug on his reconsideration.

Responding to some of the criticisms levelled at the plan, Col. Corkery disputed the assertion that placing the LAV at the Cenotaph would “glorify war” but rather serve as a “monument” in support of those who served and sacrificed for the military. The Cenotaph, he added, was the only place in Aurora that ticked all the boxes required of the Federal program, which included visitor access, visibility and upkeep.

“I am aware there have been letters to the editor, several of you have received letters against the placing of the monument,” he said. “Let me assure you, it was never our intent to cause divisiveness within the community, not where we were coming from. I would note, however, that these objections have been relatively few. I would also note, and I find this very sad, that I do not believe that the people who have written to you, or in the papers, saw fit to attend the Remembrance Day ceremony held earlier this month. The people in attendance that day seemed to be those with a connection to the military and I have yet to hear any objection from anyone, from a member or former member of the military, to this proposal.”

Placing a LAV at the Cenotaph, he argued, would be no different than decommissioned cannons, and similar purpose-built machines, being used as “monuments to sacrifice” at other war memorials around the country.

“If the Town of Aurora wishes to bend to the objections of a few, that is up to this body to determine,” concluded Col. Corkery. “In bending to those demands, I ask you to consider what you would tell those young soldiers like the two who came with me tonight. Both are veterans of peacekeeping missions in Afghanistan. As serving soldiers, they are not permitted to speak to political issues but understand this: they are reservists who volunteered to go into harm’s way. They were not ordered to go, but chose to answer the call of their government. They are not an old coot like me. They are in their prime. There are over 50 of them from my regiment alone here in the Town plus countless others across the Region.”

Rather than the LAVs being instruments of war, Col. Corkery highlighted the fact they ultimately save the lives of soldiers working in a hostile environment and take troops where they need to go to “protect villagers, to save the lives of the non-combatants” while providing a “small piece of refuge.”

Many of these issues were echoed by members of the Royal Canadian Legion. Past Legion President Ken White, for instance, said war memorials recognize many theatres, but lasting reminders of more recent conflicts are lacking.

“The War Monument is lacking one little aspect there and that is to recognize the proper respect for our modern veterans who were killed on foreign soil and have been brought back,” said Mr. White, noting a service held in May 2014 to mark the National Day of Sacrifice, an effort by the previous Conservative government to commemorate such veterans, but leaving local Legions very little time to put together a fitting event. “One Afghan vet of five tours showed up. He had lots of problems and we brought him back to the Legion afterwards and he said, ‘Where’s our memorial?’ I said, ‘It’s coming.’ I’ll just leave it at that.”

Facebooktwittermail


Readers Comments (1)

  1. Alexandra says:

    Dear Brock,
    I am really pleased to see that the Auroran has taken a supportive position about this matter.
    It sadens me to read that anyone would oppose a monument to our veterans. It is ignorant and disrespecful.
    I appreciate that you can see what the LAV means to those that fought overseas.
    I will tell you that my partner is an Afghanistan veteran who drove a LAV for 9 months, his life was indeed protected by this armer vehicle as well as the lives of those he was in charge to protect.
    From those 158 fallen soldiers, two my parter knew as close friends. Today he lives with severe PTSD that affects every aspect of his and our lifes. We are reminded daily that freedom is never free and I for one am grateful for every sacrifice that these men and women have made, my children get to live safe and free and have a future.
    Im a grateful that we can have a voice for them and a monument to remind us that war is not pretty and that monuments are not about beauty but sacrifice and pain. If this “glorifies war” on the eyes of the ignorant so be it. The fact of the matter is Canadians have many reasons to be grateful today and this is something that folks who live their lives free have no way to ever understand, what it takes and what it does to the families of those abroad.
    As a resident of Aurora and the partner of a veteran of the Afghanistan war I welcome and celebrate this monument, as you said there should be more done for those that fight for our country than just monuments but the least we can do is not ignorantly argue their value.
    Ask the people that oppose this what would they do if they knew someone that has lost their lives or the ability to live normal lives due to their sacrifice, what will their families tell you? what have they lost? I am sure they speak out of not knowing what this means.
    No monument is ever going to bring them their loved ones back whether they have lost them abroad or after their return. But it will at least show that this country values and appreciates what they’ve lost to give the ignorant ones an opinion. I like to hear more about what the families and veterans themselves feel on this matter. I feel the need to speak up on behalf of my partner our children and our family and I cant wait for the unveiling date!


You must be logged in to post a comment.

Page Reader Press Enter to Read Page Content Out Loud Press Enter to Pause or Restart Reading Page Content Out Loud Press Enter to Stop Reading Page Content Out Loud Screen Reader Support