Letters

Reader questions “fiscal sense” of Armoury roof choice

July 5, 2018   ·   0 Comments

Wow, Council sure can spend our tax dollars. Making the decision to clad the Armoury in a zinc roof at over 12 times the cost of a metal roof but only a life span 2 1/2 times longer than the metal appears to be a rather poor monetary decision.
How does that make any fiscal sense?
Pay $30K today for a metal roof. At the rate of inflation, at the end of the metal roof’s lifespan it would cost slightly over $60K to replace. So, after 80 years the cost of a metal roof would be slightly over $90K. However, Council chose to spend $380K for a roof that would be coming to the end of its lifespan at the time the metal roof requires replacing.
If a metal roof were used, after 80 years, we would still be ahead by approximately $290K.
Also, how can the Town architect propose such a fiscally irresponsible solution and then Council goes along with the recommendation?!
This is being very flippant and not fiscally responsible with our tax dollars.

Juergen Daurer
Aurora

Editor’s Note: The actual cost for the metal roof is $200,000. The $30,000 figure stems from other exterior work.

         

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusmail


Readers Comments (0)


You must be logged in to post a comment.

Page Reader Press Enter to Read Page Content Out Loud Press Enter to Pause or Restart Reading Page Content Out Loud Press Enter to Stop Reading Page Content Out Loud Screen Reader Support
Open