{"id":3577,"date":"2013-08-21T15:21:56","date_gmt":"2013-08-21T19:21:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/?p=3577"},"modified":"2013-09-04T16:35:59","modified_gmt":"2013-09-04T20:35:59","slug":"no-realistic-option-in-cell-phone-tower-dispute","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/no-realistic-option-in-cell-phone-tower-dispute\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cNo realistic option\u201d in cell phone tower dispute"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>(The west side of Bathurst Street was lined with signs this spring objecting to a Bell Canada tower looming over neighbourhoods on the west side of Aurora.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>By Brock Weir<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Aurora is left with \u201cno realistic option\u201d over the controversial Bell Canada tower just over the border in King Township, according to legal experts.<\/p>\n<p>Council released the legal opinion last week of outside legal counsel hired to investigate the possibility of undertaking a judicial review over the tower, which looms over an Aurora neighbourhood from the west side of Bathurst Street. <\/p>\n<p>After lengthy debates at the Council table throughout the spring, including cursory discussions with Bell Canada, investigations over a legal injunction, and an overhaul of how notifications and approvals over communications towers are handled by the Town, Council took one last shot at doing something about it by seeking legal advice on June 25 on the feasibility of a judicial review.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA judicial review to cease Bell\u2019s use and operation of the cell phone tower is extremely unlikely to succeed, and the expenditure of Town funds on such a fruitless endeavour is not recommended,\u201d said Town Solicitor Warren Mar in his report to Council. \u201cUnfortunately, it appears that the Town is left with no realistic legal options regarding the removal of the cell phone tower or stopping its use by Bell Canada.\u201d<br \/>\nIn his report, Mr. Mar cites the legal opinion retained from Bruce Engell of WeirFoulds.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMr. Engell verbally noted that proceeding with a judicial review in this matter (while extremely unlikely to succeed in having the cell phone tower removed) would cost in the neighbourhood of $50,000 to $100,000 \u2013 and likely to be much closer to the higher cost since any lawyer who takes on the case will have to do more work, and bring in a wide variety of evidence to even begin building the case. <\/p>\n<p>\u201c[He also noted] the Town would be exposed to a cost award should its judicial review application be dismissed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In his letter to Mr. Mar dated August 8, Mr. Engell said the only issue with a judicial review is whether the ultimate authority in this case acted properly within its power. In his review of the case, he said procedural irregularities in this instance were \u201crelatively minor\u201d and unlikely to have much weight in the outcome and a lack of \u201csubstantive violations of the protocol.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In his opinion, the Town received notice Bell was putting a cell tower up on the land, \u201cas did some residents, whereas some of the residents appear to have not received notice at all.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The watershed moment, however, happened when the switch was flipped and the cell tower was put into operation. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cBoth King Township and Industry Canada have decision-making power with respect to the consultation process,\u201d Mr. Engell concluded. \u201cAccordingly, both are potential \u2018decision makers\u2019 whose role in the public consultation process may be subject to judicial review. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf it is the specific procedural failings of the process that the Town (or the ratepayers) wish to pursue, it would seem the appropriate respondent is King Township, which had the delegated authority to oversee Bell in this case.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe do not see that the Town can raise any substantive concerns with the locating of the cell phone tower, as there is no evidence of visual or health impact rising to the level that would be seriously considered by a judge on judicial review. Meanwhile, the procedural irregularities do not appear to rise to the level of seriousness which is required by the courts on judicial review&#8230;Given how challenging mounting even a credible case would be, the Town would incur significant legal expenses to bring one. It would also be exposed to costs awarded against it if the court dismissed the application.\u201d<br \/>\nWith the King tower fully operational, Aurora residents can now turn their attention to another cell phone tower proposed for Bayview Avenue and Wellington Street East, slated for just behind the Longo\u2019s supermarket.<br \/>\nA public meeting on the proposal is scheduled for Tuesday, September 3 from 5 p.m. \u2013 7 p.m. in the Magna Room at the Aurora Public Library. The meeting will be facilitated by the Altus Group on behalf of Bell Canada.<\/p>\n<p>The proposal comprises of a 29.9 metre flagpole style tower with an equipment shelter and perimeter fencing, just meters between the grocery store and the residential development stemming from John West Way. <\/p>\n<p>To make written submissions to the consultant on the plan or to obtain further information, one can contact Alexandra Schaffhauser by citing file number \u201cd11-(ex)04-13\u201d at  comments.agi@altusgroup.com, over the phone at 416-204-5141, by fax at 416-641-9507, or by writing:<\/p>\n<p><em>Alexandra Schaffhauser<br \/>\nBell Mobility c\/o Altus Group<br \/>\n33 Yonge Street, Suite 500<br \/>\nToronto, ON M5E 1G4<br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n<a class=\"synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-24 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-facebook nolightbox\" data-provider=\"facebook\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" title=\"Share on Facebook\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newspapers-online.com%2Fauroran%2Fwp-json%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fposts%2F3577&#038;t=%E2%80%9CNo%20realistic%20option%E2%80%9D%20in%20cell%20phone%20tower%20dispute&#038;s=100&#038;p&#091;url&#093;=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newspapers-online.com%2Fauroran%2Fwp-json%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fposts%2F3577&#038;p&#091;images&#093;&#091;0&#093;=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newspapers-online.com%2Fauroran%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F08%2F2013-08-21-18.jpg&#038;p&#091;title&#093;=%E2%80%9CNo%20realistic%20option%E2%80%9D%20in%20cell%20phone%20tower%20dispute\" style=\"font-size: 0px;width:24px;height:24px;margin:0;margin-bottom:5px;margin-right:5px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"Facebook\" title=\"Share on Facebook\" class=\"synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share\" width=\"24\" height=\"24\" style=\"display: inline;width:24px;height:24px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/wp-content\/plugins\/social-media-feather\/synved-social\/image\/social\/regular\/48x48\/facebook.png\" \/><\/a><a class=\"synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-24 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-twitter nolightbox\" data-provider=\"twitter\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" title=\"Share on Twitter\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newspapers-online.com%2Fauroran%2Fwp-json%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fposts%2F3577&#038;text=Like%3F\" style=\"font-size: 0px;width:24px;height:24px;margin:0;margin-bottom:5px;margin-right:5px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"twitter\" title=\"Share on Twitter\" class=\"synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share\" width=\"24\" height=\"24\" style=\"display: inline;width:24px;height:24px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/wp-content\/plugins\/social-media-feather\/synved-social\/image\/social\/regular\/48x48\/twitter.png\" \/><\/a><a class=\"synved-social-button synved-social-button-share synved-social-size-24 synved-social-resolution-single synved-social-provider-mail nolightbox\" data-provider=\"mail\" rel=\"nofollow\" title=\"Share by email\" href=\"mailto:?subject=%E2%80%9CNo%20realistic%20option%E2%80%9D%20in%20cell%20phone%20tower%20dispute&#038;body=Like%3F:%20https%3A%2F%2Fwww.newspapers-online.com%2Fauroran%2Fwp-json%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fposts%2F3577\" style=\"font-size: 0px;width:24px;height:24px;margin:0;margin-bottom:5px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"mail\" title=\"Share by email\" class=\"synved-share-image synved-social-image synved-social-image-share\" width=\"24\" height=\"24\" style=\"display: inline;width:24px;height:24px;margin: 0;padding: 0;border: none;box-shadow: none\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/wp-content\/plugins\/social-media-feather\/synved-social\/image\/social\/regular\/48x48\/mail.png\" \/><\/a>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As Aurora Council has been told there is &#8220;no realistic option&#8221; for a judicial review over a controversial cell tower in neighbouring King Township, Bell Canada is gearing up for a round of public consultation on a new tower at Bayview and Wellington on September 2. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":3570,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3577","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-archive"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/2013-08-21-18.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3D2k4-VH","publishpress_future_action":{"enabled":false,"date":"2026-04-18 09:59:34","action":"change-status","newStatus":"draft","terms":[],"taxonomy":"category","extraData":[]},"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3577","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3577"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3577\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3570"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3577"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3577"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newspapers-online.com\/auroran\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3577"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}