<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<upm-export>
	<title>The Auroran</title>
	<link>https://www.newspapers-online.com/auroran</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon May 4 14:05:39 2026 / +0000  GMT</pubDate>
	<generator>Universal Post Manager 1.1.2 [ www.ProfProjects.com ] </generator>
	<language></language>
	
			<item>
			<title>Rental apartments proposed for John West Way and Wellington</title>
			<link>http://www.newspapers-online.com/auroran/?p=24237</link>
			<pubDate>Mon May 4 14:05:39 2026 / +0000  GMT</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspapers-online.com/auroran/?p=24237</guid>
			<content-encoded><![CDATA[<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>By Brock Weir</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>A rental apartment building of
more than 130 units has been proposed for the northeast corner of John West Way
and Wellington Street East, but the plans have left some neighbours seeing red.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Plans for the six-storey
apartment building were presented at a recent Public Planning meeting.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>There, proponents behind the
project were seeking amendments to area zoning which are presently designated
as commercial lands. A zoning bylaw amendment would pave they way for a
residential build. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>The land in question has been
the subject of considerable speculation. Originally zoned for commercial use in
the 1990s, several plaza proposals for the site have come and gone, some
rejected by Council as they did not fit in with the vision of the Aurora
Promenade Plan. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>This is a different vision
altogether for the corner and one planners say could act as a “gateway” to
Downtown Aurora.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>If completed to the vision of
planners, the building would consist of 134 units spread over six storeys with
175 surface and underground parking spots. Town bylaws currently only permit
five-storey builds in this area, but developers are hoping to get an extra
floor approved through the bonusing process, where the Town would make certain
allowances in exchange for parts of the project benefiting the whole community.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>In this case, that community
benefit would be nearby trail enhancements, according to planners.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“This is the beginning of the
process,” said Katherine Bibby, Planner for the Town of Aurora. “We're looking
at the one-storey bonusing provision and we're reviewing the potential for
community benefits. Currently, there are trail enhancements proposed to provide
that community benefit.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“Public comments [on the
proposals] have been received since the notice was placed in the papers. The
comments are primarily related to environmental matters due to the floodplain,
trees, wildlife, and the Aurora Community Arboretum, which is in proximity to
the site. There are concerns about traffic on John West Way. There have been
enquiries on whether affordable units will be available for seniors, or whether
it will be rental or condominium.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Indeed, these topics were very
much the subjects of conversation by the time the proposal hit the Council
table at June's Public Planning meeting.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>While some residents said they
welcomed more rental housing opportunities coming to Aurora, particularly for
downsizing seniors, others were concerned about traffic in and out of the
building having a negative impact on what is already a very busy vehicle
corridor currently the subject of a traffic calming study.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“The entrance to this proposed
building is opposite the Tim Hortons entranceway,” said John West Way resident
Keith Ingle. “This is one of the busiest intersections in Town and this
proposal would mean a severe increase to the traffic in the area, and it is
already dangerous going in and out of there. I think if this does get passed,
the entranceway has to be somewhere else other than where it is. That is too
heavy a traffic burden on the area.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>These worries were shared by
Mark Wyatt, a resident of Amberhill Way, a street immediately east of Town
Hall, which is being reviewed for a future three-way stop.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“The traffic is pretty crazy
trying to get off Amberhil onto John West Way,” he said. “Every once in a
while, we do hear some horrendous accidents [at the corner of] John West Way
and Wellington.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Another Amberhill resident
described the proposal as “trying to fit an elephant into a bathtub.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Residents' concerns were noted
by Council members and Town Staff at the meeting. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Responding to some of the
questions, Town Planner David Waters addressed the issue of the proposed
building's driveway facing the entrance to the plaza across the street.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“The best place to locate that
intersection is opposite another intersection,” said Mr. Waters. “In terms of
the traffic on Amberhil, Council has directed us to review the traffic flow at
the moment and determine the best way to control it, whether it is through stop
signs or through a crosswalk or a light. We're going to have a look at that and
report back.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>On the side of lawmakers,
Councillors Sandra Humfryes and Wendy Gaertner said they shared residents'
traffic concerns, but Council voted to accept the application in order for it
to move to a future General Committee meeting for a more formal Council debate.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>While concerned residents will
have to wait for a date to be set, Mayor Tom Mrakas made his feelings clear. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“We're going to move it forward
to a GC, but it doesn't mean we're making any decisions tonight,” he said. “I
think there are some concerns, major concerns. We have all tried to get some
coffee at that Tim Hortons there and we all know how hard it is to get out and
how crazy traffic can be in that area.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Mayor Mrakas added that in his
years sitting at the table, both as Mayor and Councillor, that he has never
seen a traffic report hit the table that raised alarm bells, and that is
concerning. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Also of concern, he noted, was
the planners' intent to apply for an extra storey beyond what is currently
allowed in zoning provisions.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“I am looking through this
application and I don't necessarily see that benefit to warrant giving a
bonusing provision for that additional height,” he said. “Frankly, without that
community benefit, I would be absolutely against a six-storey building at that
corner. I would be willing to have that conversation on a five-storey building,
but at six storeys I'm against it.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“When we get all that
information and come back to [General Committee] is when we can make a
decision, whether it is the right thing for the community or not, whether it is
being overdeveloped, whether it is appropriate. Let's give the opportunity for
the applicant to work with staff, work with residents, try to alleviate some of
those concerns and if those concerns aren't met, for me, if this proposal comes
back and it looks exactly the way it is, my vote would be a no at that time.” </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->]]></content-encoded>
			<excerpt-encoded><![CDATA[]]></excerpt-encoded>
			<wp-post_id>24237</wp-post_id>
			<wp-post_date>2019-07-11 19:04:49</wp-post_date>
			<wp-post_date_gmt>2019-07-11 23:04:49</wp-post_date_gmt>
				</item>
</upm-export>
