<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<upm-export>
	<title>The Auroran</title>
	<link>https://www.newspapers-online.com/auroran</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat Jul 18 2:55:33 2026 / +0000  GMT</pubDate>
	<generator>Universal Post Manager 1.1.2 [ www.ProfProjects.com ] </generator>
	<language></language>
	
			<item>
			<title>Mandatory face coverings must “complement” physical distancing, hygiene: Region</title>
			<link>http://www.newspapers-online.com/auroran/?p=27031</link>
			<pubDate>Sat Jul 18 2:55:33 2026 / +0000  GMT</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspapers-online.com/auroran/?p=27031</guid>
			<content-encoded><![CDATA[<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Mandatory face coverings will be required in all indoor
public spaces this Friday, July 17, but the new measures must “complement”
physical distancing and other hygiene guidelines, caution York Region Public
Health Officials.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>The Region's medical team stated their case in favour of
mandatory masks and face coverings at a Special Council Meeting last Thursday,
which lasted more than six hours through a series of presentations, discussions
on merits, enforcement and education, and closed-door sessions.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>There, the team led by Dr. Karim Kurji, York Region's
Medical Officer of Health, said a decision on the use of masks is best made by
Regional Council, but made a case for its efficacy going forward.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“Face coverings are an additional measure and not a
substitute for other things like physical distancing,” said Dr. Fareen
Karachiwalla, Associate Medical Officer of Health. “The question before Council
today is whether all various factors that I'll present warrant moving beyond
recommending face coverings to requiring their use for purposes of what we call
‘source control' – wearing a mask to protect others around you and not
necessarily yourself, and that is in keeping with the latest science.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>The pandemic, she said, is “somewhat unpredictable and
can change quite a bit from week to week” and last week was still too early to
accurately gauge the impacts of York Region moving into Stage 2 of Ontario's re-opening
plan.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“If you look at the evidence as a whole, it is growing in
support of the effectiveness of face coverings,” continued Dr. Karachiwalla.
“If you compare places with very high rates of face coverings with those that
don't have as high rates, including the US, there is a positive effect on
things like death rates [and] daily growth of cases. Modelling studies have
also found that more widespread use [of masks does] prevent a substantial
portion of both cases and deaths, and one or two modelling studies actually
point to how the effect is most optimal when the uptake [in mask use] in the
population is closer to 80 per cent.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“We also know based on studies looking at performance of
face coverings that some face coverings can actually be a suitable alternative
to medical masks, particularly when they are made up of at least two layers of
tightly-woven yet breathable fabric and adequately cover the nose and mouth and
go below the chin.&nbsp; One modelling study
even found that even with the lower quality face coverings, a benefit can be
had when the uptake is high – that 80 per cent range.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>While the Region did not have “definitive estimates” on
the use of face coverings in York Region in either different settings nor
different communities, survey data and “some observations” gave them a “rough
idea” and they calculated that average face mask use stood at approximately 65
per cent. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“In addition to our own observations, a population survey
that was recently conducted on Canadians found that in Ontario about 56 per
cent of people report wearing face coverings and they do this more often when
going to places like grocery stores or pharmacies and, interestingly, a bit
less so on transit and when going into their own workplaces,” said Dr.
Karachiwalla.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>But, benefits of a more universal approach to face
covering use are myriad, she noted, including resulting in “feelings of
empowerment in the community” because people feel they are doing something to
“take action” against COVID-19, and it can also help reduce the stigma for
those who are wearing face coverings “because they themselves are at higher
risk” and normalizes their use.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“One of the interesting findings of some of the studies I
am looking at is the fact that face coverings can provide a very strong visual
cue of the fact the pandemic continues to be ongoing and actually because of
this visual cue or symbol oftentimes [people are] more likely to follow
physical distancing because of that signal,” she said. “That is informative for
us and provides a bit more context and information to some claims that face
coverings might result in actually riskier behaviour because of a false sense
of security. More universal use of face coverings can also help frontline
workers, so at grocery stores or retail outlets, for example, feel more
protected [and] comfortable while at work.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Yet, there are also “unintended risks”, she said. While
wearing face coverings is “usually quite safe” exceptions must be made for
people who have breathing difficulties, have certain medical conditions, or
can't safely put on or take off face masks independently. Exemptions should
also be made for younger children. Another potential negative she underscored
for members of Regional Council was the adverse impact mandatory face coverings
would have on individuals, such as the hearing impaired, who rely more than
most on lip-reading and facial communication. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“What is really important to keep in mind is the possible
impact on people that are unable to wear face covering because of medical
reasons. These individuals may feel pressure to disclose their health status,
and that is typically not required, and may experience some negative social
reaction from others if they are not wearing a face covering, or isolation if
they feel more reluctant to go out into the community. Any policy must be quite
mindful of this and public education is needed to inform the community of
reasons why people may not be able to wear face coverings. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“Other equity considerations to keep in mind [are]
regularly procuring a face covering could represent a financial or time barrier
to some families, and depending on enforcement, monetary fines can add a
financial burden.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>That's why, she said, the primary goal with recommending
mandatory face coverings is education – providing a “verbal reminder to patrons
as opposed to strict enforcement.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“Face coverings are not a standalone intervention,” she
said. “They are just one type of intervention and they must be complimented
with others like the physical distancing, hand-washing and, of course, the
cornerstone of public health intervention, which is testing and contact
tracing. These are things that York Region is performing quite well on. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“Regardless of the decision that Council takes today, York Region will continue to actively monitor trends in disease, manage and educate the public, track the evidence very carefully and continue to evaluate and re-evaluate the need for any changes in direction.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>By Brock Weir</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->]]></content-encoded>
			<excerpt-encoded><![CDATA[]]></excerpt-encoded>
			<wp-post_id>27031</wp-post_id>
			<wp-post_date>2020-07-16 17:56:01</wp-post_date>
			<wp-post_date_gmt>2020-07-16 21:56:01</wp-post_date_gmt>
				</item>
</upm-export>
