<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<upm-export>
	<title>The Auroran</title>
	<link>https://www.newspapers-online.com/auroran</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon Apr 27 17:48:09 2026 / +0000  GMT</pubDate>
	<generator>Universal Post Manager 1.1.2 [ www.ProfProjects.com ] </generator>
	<language></language>
	
			<item>
			<title>Aurora needs “progressive” action on ward system</title>
			<link>http://www.newspapers-online.com/auroran/?p=8767</link>
			<pubDate>Mon Apr 27 17:48:09 2026 / +0000  GMT</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspapers-online.com/auroran/?p=8767</guid>
			<content-encoded><![CDATA[<em>(Re: Ward system would be “counterintuitive” to Aurora's small-town feel. October 15, 2014)</em>

We read Mr. Wride's comments as to why a ward system for Aurora would be counterintuitive with interest. While all opinions are interesting, he uses Mayor Dawe's term for a ward system as being parochial once again.
What is narrow-minded about citizens wanting representations for their specific neighbourhoods? Why would a ward approach detract from the “small town” atmosphere?
Aurora is not a small town anymore. We have “big town” neighbourhood issues needing attention. How can an individual Councillor possibly be interested in all Aurora's neighbourhoods? Why would a ward system be divisive if the citizens' neighbourhood's needs were being met?
Mr. Wride's letter ends by stating it would be less democratic. There is a great leap in logic here. 
Canada's Federal and Provincial parliamentary systems are based on individual MPs elected on the basis of specific areas. Aurora needs to move forward on a progressive basis with a ward system.

<strong>John Greenhough
Aurora
</strong>]]></content-encoded>
			<excerpt-encoded><![CDATA[]]></excerpt-encoded>
			<wp-post_id>8767</wp-post_id>
			<wp-post_date>2014-10-29 17:09:00</wp-post_date>
			<wp-post_date_gmt>2014-10-29 21:09:00</wp-post_date_gmt>
				</item>
</upm-export>
