<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<upm-export>
	<title>The Auroran</title>
	<link>https://www.newspapers-online.com/auroran</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat Jun 13 21:07:10 2026 / +0000  GMT</pubDate>
	<generator>Universal Post Manager 1.1.2 [ www.ProfProjects.com ] </generator>
	<language></language>
	
			<item>
			<title>Apartment proposal leaves residents worried over backyard damage</title>
			<link>http://www.newspapers-online.com/auroran/?p=24235</link>
			<pubDate>Sat Jun 13 21:07:10 2026 / +0000  GMT</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspapers-online.com/auroran/?p=24235</guid>
			<content-encoded><![CDATA[<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>By Brock Weir</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Neighbours on
Aurora's Amberhill Way are concerned about property and environmental damage if
a six-storey apartment development just south of their property lines comes to
fruition.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>At issue is a
134-unit rental apartment building proposed for the northeast corner of John
West Way and Wellington.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>The site in question
has changed hands many times over the years, along with the visions each
property owner has had for the site, but the latest vision, if it ultimately
receives the green light, could see significant changes to the property's
topography to accommodate the building's footprint. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>According to
Katherine Bibby, Planner for the Town of Aurora, the developers' application
will require the removal of land near Amberhill property lines to create fill
to support the build.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Similar work began
on the site when the John West Way area was first being developed to
accommodate both Town Hall and the street itself in the early 1990s, but was
halted shortly thereafter.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Since then, a
community has been built up around the valley, which could be a gamechanger –
and that is the hope of neighbours who turned out at last month's Public
Planning meeting.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“Due to the
introduction of fill to accommodate development, cut and fill balance is
required to ensure the floodplain capacity is not affected by the application,”
Ms. Bibby told Council. “Removal of the soil on the east side of the water
course will ensure enough area is available.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>The Lake Simcoe
Conservation Authority (LSRCA), she noted, is currently reviewing the studies
proponents have provided and are expected to provide feedback.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Feedback, however,
was swift when the application was before Council. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>While
representatives for the developers said filling was partially carried out in
1990, that a further cut and fill analysis was approved for the site in 2015,
and new plantings of trees and wetland plants would represent a “net gain to
the environmental system,” neighbours were unconvinced.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“I can't understand
how there's no environmental impact on
transferring fill from one side of the river to the other,” said John West Way
resident Keith Ingle on impacts to the tributary of the East Holland River that
flows through the site. “How will the river be protected? That is not clear
yet. Maybe it is too early, but I for one don't think that you can avoid an
environmental impact to build this structure. I think it is a very sensitive
area and perhaps it should be something else [that is not] intensifying the
population.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Other residents said
they appreciated the need for affordable rental units, but not in a land that
was “environmentally special.” More said they were particularly concerned that
cut and fill on their side of the valley would lead to the erosion of their
backyards.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“The proposed cut and
fill activities in the area [is] intended to be a very gentle grading
exercise,” replied Amber Palmer, representing the applicants. “The full grading
exercise [in 1990] was not completed at that time and I would say about 50 per
cent of the cut area was completed and 50 per cent of the fill area was
completed. Back in around 2011, we did a survey of the area to verify how much
cut and fill had been completed to determine whether or not additional work
could be completed under the initial application and it was agreed through
staff that that was the case. What we're proposing is very consistent with what
was initially proposed for this area. The cut is intended to be very minor, in
particular near the water course.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>But Councillor Wendy
Gaertner said she shared residents concerns, adding that a lot has changed in
the area over the past three decades.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>“I am very
concerned,” she said. “The approval given in 1990 was given in a whole
different world. That was 30 years ago and now we have climate change and
predictions of severe rains and flooding. To me, it is very concerning and I
also don't like that the meadowland is going to be removed because the
meadowland is important.”</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>The application was accepted at the Public
Planning meeting and will come before Council at a future General Committee
meeting for further discussion and community input.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->]]></content-encoded>
			<excerpt-encoded><![CDATA[Neighbours on Aurora’s Amberhill Way are concerned about property and environmental damage if a six-storey apartment development just south of their property lines comes to fruition.]]></excerpt-encoded>
			<wp-post_id>24235</wp-post_id>
			<wp-post_date>2019-07-11 19:04:01</wp-post_date>
			<wp-post_date_gmt>2019-07-11 23:04:01</wp-post_date_gmt>
				</item>
</upm-export>
